In the previous post I talked about the Tiny Mike mini
shotgun mic for small to medium productions. It is great to have such large
sound capturing capabilities in such a small package. It attaches to DSLR
cameras for flexibility when recording your footage and need to be mobile or in
a cramped space.
For those who need a larger mic to handle larger productions
and who happen to have a larger budget to spend on equipment, check out the Schoeps
SuperCMIT 2U shotgun microphone. Based on the amazingly high quality Schoeps
CMIT5, the Super CMIT 2U has increased directivity, suppresses the diffuse
sound field so you can film in noisy environments and with one flip of a switch
the mic supresses the background noise
significantly.
Here are the specs:
Transducer
|
Condenser
|
Polar Pattern
|
Supercardioid
|
Frequency Response
|
Not Specified By Manufacturer
|
Signal-to-Noise Ratio
|
Channel 1: 14dB-A, RMS, 26dB CCIR
Channel 2: 16dB-A, RMS, 28dB CCIR |
Maximum Input Sound Level
|
125dB
|
Power Requirements
|
10V Digital Phantom Power
Includes PSD 2 U Power Supply |
Output Connectors
|
3-pin XLR
|
Low Frequency Roll-Off
|
80Hz with 18dB/oct
5dB Lift @ 10kHz (Shelving) |
Dimensions (LxDiameter)
|
11 x 0.83" (280 x 21mm)
|
Weight
|
4 oz (112g)
|
The digital signal processing algorithms from Illusonic help with suppression
of unwanted noise in the filming location, but some users say this can make the
vocals slightly thin. If you find that to be true simply turn off the DSP to
utilize the direct, single-transducer and change it to the analogue mic based on
the original Schoeps CMIT 5.
Priced around $5,000 this mic is for serious sound professionals and for years has been the standard for high-quality sound capturing on film and television productions.
This product sounds incredible, and of course very useful for film or live broadcasting applications. The preset features he demonstrated were quiet impressive, although I was able to detect sound timbre and frequency changes to his voice as he toggled from A to B settings. However, it definitely removed a lot of the background noise. It's a give and take sort of deal.
ReplyDeleteI agree, Oscar. It is sort of a trade off. Thanks for the comment.
ReplyDelete